California’s AI Plan Review — For Cities and Builders
We Have a Housing Crisis.
CrossBeam Solves It.
Two sides of the counter, one review: CrossBeam reads full plan sets against California law and your city’s code. Cities draft corrections letters in hours instead of weeks. Builders catch the corrections before they’re ever written. AI drafts. Your people approve.
Just have a permit question? Ask the CrossBeam Permit Assistant →
Hundreds of pages. Months of work. Compressed into hours.
A builder’s full plan set lands at the city — watch CrossBeam work the loop.
Demo results: 132 sheets read; 2 corrections, 1 flag promoted to a correction by staff, 1 pass. 1. Common wall rating not shown (CRC R302.2.2, Sheet A-2.1) — correction. 2. Window U-factors not scheduled (CEC 160.1(e), Sheet A-6.0) — flagged by the engine, promoted to a correction by staff. 3. Side setback meets zoning (AMC §18.06.090, Sheet A-1.0) — pass. 4. Stair riser exceeds maximum (CRC R318.7.5.1, Sheet A-4.2) — correction. Round 1: the city sends the corrections letter. The builder fixes every item with CrossBeam Corrections Analysis and resubmits. Round 2: the city verifies each fix and approves. The letter, the fixes, the verification — approved in two rounds, every step through CrossBeam.
1st Place — Anthropic’s Claude Code Hackathon 2026 · 13,000 applicants
How It Works
Four steps. A human always reviews before anything goes out.
Upload Plans
Drag and drop a plan set or a corrections letter. PDF, any size.
AI Reviews
CrossBeam reads every page and cross-references California law and your city’s municipal code.
Draft Generated
A corrections letter — or a builder’s pre-check report before submittal — drafted with code citations and sheet references.
Human Reviews
Your staff reviews, edits, and approves. Nothing goes out without a human sign-off.
Same Engine, Both Sides.
Everything above runs on CrossBeam Pre-Check — one review engine, purpose-built for plan check, that reads a plan set sheet by sheet the way a plan checker does. Around it, five tools that carry a permit from first question to final sign-off.
Around the Engine
One Plan Set, Two Timelines
- 90%+ of plan sets get corrections in San Jose — Mercury News.
- 35,800 fewer local-government workers than in 2020 mean fewer plan-check hands — UC Berkeley Labor Center.
- Consultant re-review runs $150–175 per hour; the city eats $300–625 per correction round.
- A 6-month permitting delay costs a builder about $30,000 in lost rent, inflation, and loan carry.
- 429,503 ADU permits filed in California since 2018 — Shovels.ai.
- A CrossBeam Pre-Check runs in about 30 minutes. The city still reviews — you skip the correction rounds and approval lands around Month 2 instead of Month 6.
Both sides lose. CrossBeam is on the side of more housing, built faster, built to code.
Watch the video that won the entire Anthropic hackathon.
Full corrections analysis on a real Placentia ADU permit — 14 items parsed, verified, and responded to.
Try It Right Now
Ask the Permit Assistant anything about California permits — setbacks, height limits, sprinklers, what permit your project even needs. It’s grounded in 16,000+ pages of state code and each onboarded city’s rules, drawn from research spanning 480+ California city codes.
Ask the Permit Assistant