
Verify the resubmittal. Don't re-review it.
When the builder resubmits, CrossBeam compares the new plan set to your original corrections letter — verifying each item was actually fixed, and flagging unrelated major changes — instead of forcing a from-scratch re-review.
Coming soon — for cities already reviewing with CrossBeam.
Who it's for
The Correction Tax, paid again.
Every re-review round costs your department $300–$625 in consultant time at $150–$175/hr — and the applicant's original fee already covered the first pass. A verification pass against a known letter is a fraction of a from-scratch re-review. Every round you can verify instead of re-review is money the city keeps.
$300–$625
consultant cost per re-review round
Public consultant contracts — CSG, WC3, Bureau Veritas hourly rates from city council records
$150–$175/hr
billed consultant plan-check rates
What it checks
How it works
- 1
The letter is already structured
Your original corrections letter was issued through CrossBeam, so every item exists as a structured finding — not prose to reinterpret.
- 2
The resubmittal comes in
CrossBeam checks the new plan set against each item in the letter and flags major changes your letter never asked for.
- 3
Your plan checker signs
Every verdict arrives as a draft with evidence. Staff confirm, override, and sign — same as everywhere else in CrossBeam.
How It Fits — The CrossBeam System
Pre-Check drafts the letter; Corrections Response verifies the fixes. One engine holds both ends of the correction cycle — every item written, fixed, and verified in one record, so nothing gets lost between rounds.
One honest requirement
Corrections Response works when the original letter was issued through CrossBeam — the engine verifies against the letter's own structured findings. That's what makes verification possible instead of a second full review. If your city is already reviewing with CrossBeam, resubmittal checking comes with the loop.
480+
California city codes
16,000+
pages of state code & local rules
Questions
Does it work if our original letter wasn't issued through CrossBeam?
No — and that's the honest requirement. The engine verifies against the letter's own structured findings, which is what makes verification possible instead of a second full review. If your city is already reviewing with CrossBeam, resubmittal checking comes with the loop.
What does a verdict actually look like?
Item by item: verified, partially addressed, or unresolved — each with evidence. "Verified" means fixed on the sheet, not a note that changed while the detail didn't. And the results are drafts: your plan checker confirms, overrides, and signs.
What if the builder changed something my letter never mentioned?
That's the check nobody has time for. Major revisions unrelated to your letter get flagged — the moved gas line nobody mentioned — so a quiet redesign doesn't slide through on a corrections round.
Where does it work?
California — built on 480+ city codes, 16,000+ pages of state code and local rules, and 40+ permit types, for cities reviewing with CrossBeam.